Upper vs Lower Extremity BP in Spinal Cesarean Using ClearSight (NCT07685730)
Comparative Analysis of the Predictive Performance of Noninvasive Beat-by-Beat Blood Pressure and Flow Measurements at the Lower Extremity Versus the Upper Extremity for Neonatal Outcomes Under Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery
π©Ί Plain-English Summary (8th-Grade Level)
This is a single-center, prospective observational study in patients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. It compares whether continuous noninvasive hemodynamic measurements from the lower extremity (toe) better predict neonatal outcomes than upper extremity (arm/finger) measurements during spinal-induced hypotension. Participants receive standard spinal anesthesia and routine blood pressure management, with additional monitoring using the ClearSightβ’ system at both upper and lower extremities from before spinal anesthesia through delivery. The primary outcome is a composite of neonatal outcomes (APGAR scores, need for respiratory support, cord gases, and NICU admission). Secondary outcomes include maternal side effects and comfort. Overall, the study evaluates whether lower-extremity hemodynamic monitoring improves detection of clinically relevant hypotension and prediction of neonatal outcomes compared to traditional arm measurements.
Who can join: Review the eligibility criteria below.
Location: The Ohio State University β Columbus, Ohio
Age range: 18 Years
π§ͺ Interventions in This Study
π "Do I Qualify?" β 1-Minute Self Screener
Instant ChecklistFull eligibility criteria are available on the official NIH protocol. View the criteria β
π All Participating Trial Locations (1 Sites)
- The Ohio State University β Columbus, Ohio
π Contact the Study Coordinator
Phone: (614) 293-6302
Email: LingQun.Hu@osumc.edu
Coordinator details come directly from the registered NIH protocol. Confirm the study is still recruiting before traveling.
π° Cost, Insurance & Patient Rights
- 100% Free Items: The investigational treatment and protocol-required procedures are supplied at zero cost by the sponsor.
- Routine Patient Care: Under federal law (ACA Β§ 2709) and many state statutes, routine care costs are covered during participation.
- Voluntary Participation: You may withdraw at any time without affecting your standard medical care.
More studies in Anesthesia
- Assessment of Diagnostic Adequacy of AI-assisted Point-of-Care Echocardiography Among Anesthesiology Trainees β Loma Linda, California
- Detecting Post-surgical Respiratory Compromise and Prompting Patients to Self-rescue: An Early Feasibility Study β Salt Lake City, Utah
- Optimizing Patient-centred Outcomes Using Opioid Minimization Strategies: The OPUS Anesthesia Pilot Trial β New Westminster, British Columbia
- Hypobaric L5-S1 Study β Toronto, Ontario
- A Study to Compare the Long-term Outcomes After Two Different Anaesthetics β Boston, Massachusetts
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Pilot Study β Loma Linda, California
Explore by condition: All Anesthesia clinical trials
π‘ How to Participate
- Check the checklist above to see if you may qualify.
- Contact the study coordinator using the phone/email above.
- Ask about the visit schedule, what is covered at no cost, and any travel support.
- Confirm with your own doctor before making a decision.