Comparing Traditional Semantic Feature Analysis (tSFA) and Semantic Feature Analysis + Metacognitive Strategy Training (SFA+MST) (NCT07036406)
Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA) Versus SFA Plus Metacognitive Strategy Training (SFA+MST) for People With Acquired Aphasia
๐ฉบ Plain-English Summary (8th-Grade Level)
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of traditional Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA) treatment to a modified SFA protocol that includes Metacognitive Strategy Training (SFA+MST) for adults with acquired aphasia. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What are the comparative outcomes in picture naming accuracy and strategy use during picture naming following 2 months of traditional SFA versus SFA + MST in adults with acquired aphasia? * What are the comparative outcomes in percent of informative content and rate of informative content during spontaneous speech production following 2 months of traditional SFA versus SFA + MST in adults with acquired aphasia? Researchers will compare outcomes between these two treatments to see if SFA+MST yields larger effects in picture naming and spontaneous speech outcomes than traditional SFA. Participants will complete: * 5-7 pre-treatment assessment sessions where they will be asked to name pictures, tell stories/describe pictures, answer questions, and complete questionnaires, * 3 treatment sessions of SFA \*OR\* SFA+MST per week for 8 weeks, for a total of 24 sessions, * 7 weekly probes (i.e., short, intermittent assessments throughout the treatment phase), * 3 post-treatment assessment sessions immediately after treatment ends, where they will complete the same assessment tasks as they did pre-treatment (e.g., naming pictures, telling stories, etc.), * 2 retention assessment sessions, one 30 days and the other 60 days following the final treatment session, where they will be asked to name pictures, tell stories/describe pictures, and describe what they learned during the study.
Who can join: Review the eligibility criteria below.
Location: Teachers College, Columbia University โ New York, New York
Age range: 18 Years to 89 Years
๐งช Interventions in This Study
- Semantic Feature Analysis (traditional) (BEHAVIORAL)
- Semantic Feature Analysis + Metacognitive Strategy Training (BEHAVIORAL)
๐ "Do I Qualify?" โ 1-Minute Self Screener
Instant ChecklistFull eligibility criteria are available on the official NIH protocol. View the criteria โ
๐ All Participating Trial Locations (1 Sites)
- Teachers College, Columbia University โ New York, New York
๐ Contact the Study Coordinator
Phone: (212) 678-8302
Email: veb2119@tc.columbia.edu
Coordinator details come directly from the registered NIH protocol. Confirm the study is still recruiting before traveling.
๐ฐ Cost, Insurance & Patient Rights
- 100% Free Items: The investigational treatment and protocol-required procedures are supplied at zero cost by the sponsor.
- Routine Patient Care: Under federal law (ACA ยง 2709) and many state statutes, routine care costs are covered during participation.
- Voluntary Participation: You may withdraw at any time without affecting your standard medical care.
More studies in Aphasia
- Semantic Feature Analysis Treatment for Aphasia โ Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Genetic and Cognitive Predictors of Aphasia Treatment Response โ Columbus, Ohio
- Treatment Outcomes With tDCS in Post-Stroke Aphasia โ Little Rock, Arkansas
- Brain-based Understanding of Individual Language Differences After Stroke โ Washington D.C., District of Columbia
- HD-tDCS for Phonological Impairment in Aphasia โ Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- Effects of Semantic Context on Criterion-learning Naming Treatment in Aphasia โ Elkins Park, Pennsylvania
Explore by condition: All Aphasia clinical trials
๐ก How to Participate
- Check the checklist above to see if you may qualify.
- Contact the study coordinator using the phone/email above.
- Ask about the visit schedule, what is covered at no cost, and any travel support.
- Confirm with your own doctor before making a decision.